The First Step in Optimizing Your e-Discovery and Litigation Support Recovery Model is to Know
How You Compare
Modifying your recovery model based on industry benchmarks can increase your recovery by up to 35%.
Mattern first surveyed law firms’ cost recovery practices in 2004 and has continued to produce the industry’s most valued survey and benchmarks of cost recovery practices every two years. 2019 marks the first year Mattern surveyed litigation support and e-Discovery recovery model practices.
The 2020 e-Discovery and Litigation Support Survey (“Survey”) results focus on the following areas:
-
How firms are structuring litigation support/e-Discovery departments
-
Why firms have outsourced litigation/e-Discovery departments
-
What methodologies firms use to recover these costs – whether in-house or outsourced
-
What charges are clients pushing back on and refusing to pay
-
Percentage of these items identified as being recoverable from a client
-
Percentage of the recoverable amounts actually reimbursed by clients
-
The structure other firms are using to recover their costs
Request The
Overview Now
Litigation support and e-Discovery recovery strategies vary widely, with industry leaders recovering more than double what other firms are. Through our proven methodology, we have compiled the industry’s most trusted information regarding cost recovery practices across firms of all sizes.
Want to Learn More?
Mattern Assists an AmLaw 200 Firm Create New Cost Recovery Model to Recoup Charges for Litigation Support Solution
Going for Information Governance Gold – Closing the Gap on Discovery Materials
Selling the Value of Litigation Support
Is Your e-Discovery Solution Undermining Your Law Firm’s Competitive Advantage
So You’ve Decided on Managed Services for e-Discovery … Now What?
Is Your e-Discovery Solution Providing Client Value?